Hotspots: Admin Pages | Turn-in Site |
Current Links: Case Final Project Summer 2007
M8 - User Interface Evaluation
Requirements:
Report 1: 70 points, due Wednesday, November 19th (by midnite to Bob's Office)
1. (10 points) Clearly identify the team whose prototype you evaluated and provide a one-page description of your evaluation plan and the rationale behind the plan, i.e., why you chose to conduct that evaluation on this prototype.
2. (30 points) Results of execution of usability plan, providing clearly documented printed evidence that you conducted the evaluation plan correctly. For instance, this includes the actual raw data sheets and evaluator notes in addition to the synthesized data. I need to verify you did the evaluation you claimed to do.
3. (30 points) 3-page usability report highlighting the three top concerns arising from the usability evaluation. The report should identify clearly what each usability concern is and the evidence you have to support this problem being a real problem that should be corrected by the design team. One copy of this part of the report goes to Bob, and one copy should be given to the team you evaluated.
Report 2: 30 points
1. 3-page response of the usability report submitted to your project team. Be careful not to get defensive in this report (resist refuting that the findings of the evaluation team are incorrect). Make a clear argument for how you would address each usability concern. Assess whether the object-oriented design you developed for your prototype made it any easier to address these usability concerns.
Our Evaluation:
M8 UI for Leftovers.doc
Rebuttal:
M8 - part2.doc
Recommendations:
- Try not to be offensive, respect their ideas, be constructive in your feedback to the other team
- Try to evaluate from a non-CS/CM major perspective because it will help you find more usability problems, which can be very helpful for the other team
- In your rebuttal, try not to be defensive, write your responses in a respectful and honest manner.
Link to this Page