evaluations for "A time for change"

Mentioning the patriot act, already an authoritative policy, builds respect for your argument. some quotes worth commenting on:

“right to incarcerate someone charged with certain felonies” the prompt disscuses whether or not the government should be able to hold people without formal charges. Therefore, the us vs salerno ruling
would not be applicable—it discusses people already charged.
“to incarcerate an individual until a speedy trial can get underway . . .” the prompt does not ask should we jail people before/during their trial, it asks should we jail people without charges or an
attorney. There is a fundamental difference in the issues you discuss.
You are somewhat ambiguous, making it hard to see what your opinion on the actual issue is. The last sentence is the first real confirmation of your view, so add something like it before then.
hope it helps, contributed by spearmint

Links to this Page

Issue 4 Positions last edited on 19 April 2005 at 11:56 pm by ParrotHead
spearmint last edited on 7 April 2005 at 3:55 pm by spearmint