This document contains a history of this page, from the current version to the earliest one available.
| Version | Name | User | Date | Time | |
| current | I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 19 April 2005 | 9:21 pm | |
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 19 April 2005 | 9:20 pm | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 7 April 2005 | 2:24 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 1 April 2005 | 1:47 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 1 April 2005 | 1:46 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 1 April 2005 | 1:42 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 15 February 2005 | 2:44 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 15 February 2005 | 2:44 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 15 February 2005 | 2:43 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 15 February 2005 | 2:41 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 15 February 2005 | 2:40 am | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | Hondezy | 14 February 2005 | 4:23 pm | ||
| I believe the United States should be able to hold foreign nationals without question for a certain amount of time, so as to take care of any immediate threats. Especially if they are captured while on the battlefield! | r49h131.res.gatech.edu | 14 February 2005 | 4:23 pm | ||