View this PageEdit this PageUploads to this PageHistory of this PageHomeRecent ChangesSearchHelp Guide

polantigua


Both of the links below lead to the final version of my Policy Paper:

Final Draft of polantigua's Policy Paper



Rough Draft of Policy Paper:

Title IX is the first federal law to prohibit discrimination by sex against students and employees of educational institutions. Title IX was created in an effort to create a more leveled playing field for both male and female students. As a result of this law, male and female students are required to receive equal treatment in the following areas: recruitment, admissions, educational programs, course offerings, counseling, financial aid, employment, facilities, health benefits, scholarships, sexual harassment, and athletics. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 to the Civil Rights of 1964 states:
“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex,be excluded from the participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal assistance.”
Title IX has had a beneficial effect on high school and college athletics and should be continued. This law provides benefits for both male and female students, provides a system through which female athletes are able to gain a fair distribution of overall athletic opportunity and resources, and provides for an environment through which the success and performance of the male athlete will not be harmed in the process of distributing athletic opportunity and resources.
Title IX provides benefits for both male and female athletes as both sexes are protected from harassment regardless of who is committing the harassing behavior. In a question and answer paper produced by The Secretary's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics, the question was raised as to whether or not Title IX benefited only females. The commission responded with the following, “Title IX also protects men and boys. A continued effort to prevent or stop discrimination on the basis of sex has benefited all students by moving toward the creation of school environments where all students may learn and achieve the highest standards.” The law may appear to only benefit the female athlete, but this is only because female athletes have traditionally on the receiving end of sexual discrimination, and have generally faced gender restrictions and barriers toward their education. The law provides for the equal protection of the male athlete should any situation arise where he feels that he is being discriminated against.
As defined by the NCAA Gender Equality Task Force in 1972,
“Gender equity is an atmosphere and a reality where fair distribution of overall athletic opportunity and resources are proportionate to enrollment, are available to women and men and where no student athlete, coach or athletic administrator is discriminated against in any way in the athletic program on the basis of gender.”
Title IX provides an environment through which gender equity can be attained. This law provides the environment needed to increase the amount of opportunities and participation for females in athletics. Before Title IX was passed, females were drastically underrepresented in athletics and, and funding for females in sports was inadequate. Since Title IX came into effect on July 21, 1972, the number of high school girls involved in some sport has increased from 295,000 to over 2,400,000 in 1999. (Donnelly, Kilkelly, and Berman: Title IX: Gender Equality in Sports) In the same paper by Donnelly, Kilkelly, and Berman, it states that females who play sports are fifty percent less likely to develop breast cancer, eighty percent less likely to have unwanted pregnancies and ninety-two percent less likely to have drug problems. These statistics serve as evidence of the positive effects that increased female participation in sports. This increased opportunity and participation is brought about by Title IX.
Many have argued that Title IX, while providing more opportunities for females, has had a negative effect on the success of male athletes. Opposing views even suggest that men’s sports are being eliminated in order to enforce this law. Title IX is designed to create proportionality in athletic opportunity and quality of athletic experience. “It is a school’s choice to cut men’s programs in an effort to comply with the law or to meet budget constraints. Title IX is intended to ensure equality for both males and females.” There is no mandate under Title IX which requires a college to eliminate mane’s teams in order to comply with Title IX. The Women’s Sports Foundation provides a list of cost-saving and revenue-producing measure that can be used to reduce the likelihood of men’s teams being cut. These include, but are not limited to
• Increase revenues of men’s minor sports and women’s sports at the institutional and conference levels.
• Encourage college conference members and high school districts to adopt the same sports when expending women’s programs.
• Establish conference-level presidential review requirements for the control of athletic administration staffing and the construction and renovation of athletic facilities.
• Legislate, via the promulgation of NCAA rules, reductions in the amount of non-need-based athletic aid that institutions may award in each sport.
• Increase NCAA scholarship limits for women’s sports in order to permit institutions to meet their compliance obligations for scholarships without adding additional women’s sports teams.
While Title IX has begun the work of providing equity of opportunities and resources to athletes regardless of sex, it is imperative that Title IX is continued being enforced. Ninety percent of all television hours devoted to sports focus on men’s sports. Males still receive fifty percent in high schools and seventy-five percent in college of all athletic operating budgets and one hundred and seventy-nine million dollars more in college athletic scholarship each year. Women still have less that thirty-seven percent of all athletic participation opportunities, thirty-six percent of all scholarship dollars, thirty-six percent of sports budges and twenty-eight percent of recruiting budgets. (Donnelly, Kilkelly, and Berman) it is clearly not enough to know what Title IX states. We must realize that the future of our female athletes is at stake if we do not ensure that Title IX is enforced.
“Without Title IX, I’d be nowhere.” (Cheryl Miller, Olympic athlete)

Evaluation of paper toejam

EVALUATIONS

Evaluation of polantigua by DEEZ913

Your paper was organized and flowed well. Your position was clearly stated and defended through the paper. A few things I saw: 1) You didn’t cite some of your quotes to inform the reader where the information is coming from. The quote should resemble “Blah blah” ([author] [page number]). I’m pretty sure even if you introduce the quote beforehand you still need to cite the source. 2) You shouldn’t have bulleted information in a formal paper. It should be reformattedThese include, but are not limited to: increase revenues…; encourage…; establish…; etc. 3) I don’t think it is grammatically correct to end a paragraph in a quote, let alone a whole paper. I would definitely keep the last quote but maybe do some rearranging of the sentences around it. ~Contributed by Czechowicz





Links to this Page